<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Rules Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description>Just another  weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:54:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Rules Proposed for Probation Violation Proceedings&#160;</title>
		<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/05/20/new-rules-proposed-for-probation-violation-proceedings/</link>
		<comments>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/05/20/new-rules-proposed-for-probation-violation-proceedings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom.harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[District Court Rules for Probation Violation Proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District/Municipal Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MASSACHUSETTS STATE COURTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Changes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/?p=2450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Extensive amendments have been proposed to the District Court Rules for Probation Violation Proceedings.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/05/20/new-rules-proposed-for-probation-violation-proceedings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summary Contempt Rules May Be Modified&#160;</title>
		<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/05/07/summary-contempt-rules-may-be-modified/</link>
		<comments>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/05/07/summary-contempt-rules-may-be-modified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom.harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil, Criminal and Appellate Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass. Rules of Criminal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MASSACHUSETTS STATE COURTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Changes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/?p=2445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />A proposed change to Mass. Rule of Criminal Procedure 43 would clarify when and how a judge may impose summary punishment for criminal contempt.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/05/07/summary-contempt-rules-may-be-modified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Probate and Family Court Order on Administrative Allowance of Pleadings, Motions and Other Matters&#160;</title>
		<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/proposed-probate-and-family-court-order-on-administrative-allowance-of-pleadings-motions-and-other-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/proposed-probate-and-family-court-order-on-administrative-allowance-of-pleadings-motions-and-other-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom.harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MASSACHUSETTS STATE COURTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probate and Family Court Orders and Memoranda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialized Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/?p=2443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />A proposed Probate and Family Court Standing Order would allow a wide variety of pleadings, motions, and other matters to be handled administratively without a hearing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/24/proposed-probate-and-family-court-order-on-administrative-allowance-of-pleadings-motions-and-other-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. District Court Civil Action Filing Fee Is Increased to $400&#160;</title>
		<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/23/u-s-district-court-civil-action-filing-fee-is-increased-by-50/</link>
		<comments>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/23/u-s-district-court-civil-action-filing-fee-is-increased-by-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom.harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MASSACHUSETTS FEDERAL COURTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/?p=2432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />The filing fee for civil actions in the U.S. District Court is increased to $400, and some other minor fee changes are made to   Appendix A of the Local Rules, effective May 1, 2013.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/23/u-s-district-court-civil-action-filing-fee-is-increased-by-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-Mail Addresses May Have to Be Provided to the BBO&#160;</title>
		<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/09/e-mail-addresses-may-have-to-be-provided-to-the-bbo/</link>
		<comments>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/09/e-mail-addresses-may-have-to-be-provided-to-the-bbo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom.harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 4 (Bar Discipline and Client Security Protection)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MASSACHUSETTS STATE COURTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules of the Supreme Judicial Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Judicial Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/?p=2426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />A proposed revision of SJC Rule 4:02(1) and (10) would require lawyers to provide an e-mail address to the Board of Bar Overseers, so the Board can issue notices via e-mail.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/09/e-mail-addresses-may-have-to-be-provided-to-the-bbo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SJC Standing Order on Bar Discipline Appeals Is Extended&#160;</title>
		<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/07/sjc-standing-order-on-bar-discipline-appeals-is-extended/</link>
		<comments>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/07/sjc-standing-order-on-bar-discipline-appeals-is-extended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom.harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MASSACHUSETTS STATE COURTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orders of the Supreme Judicial Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Judicial Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2011/05/04/sjc-standing-order-on-bar-discipline-appeals-is-extended/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />The SJC Standing Order establishing a modified procedure for appeals in bar discipline cases has been extended until April 1, 2015.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/07/sjc-standing-order-on-bar-discipline-appeals-is-extended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Circuit Proposes Electronic Bar Applications and Fee Payments&#160;</title>
		<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/04/first-circuit-proposes-electronic-bar-applications-and-fee-payments/</link>
		<comments>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/04/first-circuit-proposes-electronic-bar-applications-and-fee-payments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom.harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local Rules of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MASSACHUSETTS FEDERAL COURTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals Internal Operating Procedures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/?p=2419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has proposed requiring bar applications to be submitted electronically, and requiring fee payments to be made by credit card or electronic debit rather than by check. The changes would affect Local Rule 46.0(a)(1) and Internal Operating Procedure II(A).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/04/first-circuit-proposes-electronic-bar-applications-and-fee-payments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Bankruptcy &#8216;Verification of Matrix&#8217; Form&#160;</title>
		<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/03/new-bankruptcy-verification-of-matrix-form/</link>
		<comments>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/03/new-bankruptcy-verification-of-matrix-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom.harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local Rules of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MASSACHUSETTS FEDERAL COURTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orders of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/?p=2416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />The U.S. Bankruptcy Court's new "verification of matrix" form has been added to the collection.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/04/03/new-bankruptcy-verification-of-matrix-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Limit for Filing Appeal Is Tolled by Rule 60 Motion&#160;</title>
		<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/03/26/proposal-would-extend-time-limit-for-filing-appeal-after-rule-60-motion/</link>
		<comments>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/03/26/proposal-would-extend-time-limit-for-filing-appeal-after-rule-60-motion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom.harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil, Criminal and Appellate Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District/Municipal Courts Rules for Appellate Division Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgment (Rules 54-63)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass. Rules of Appellate Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass. Rules of Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MASSACHUSETTS STATE COURTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Changes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2012/03/22/proposal-would-extend-time-limit-for-filing-appeal-after-rule-60-motion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Mass. Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) and District/Municipal Courts Rule for Appellate Division Appeal 4(a) are amended to toll the time period for filing an appeal while a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60 is being decided, if the motion was served within 10 days after entry of judgment, effective May 1, 2013. As a result, new Reporter's Notes have been added to Mass. R. A. P. 4 and to Mass. R. Civ. P. 59 and 60.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/03/26/proposal-would-extend-time-limit-for-filing-appeal-after-rule-60-motion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Court of Appeals Makes Minor Changes to Summary Disposition Motions&#160;</title>
		<link>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/03/25/u-s-court-of-appeals-proposes-minor-changes-to-summary-disposition-motions/</link>
		<comments>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/03/25/u-s-court-of-appeals-proposes-minor-changes-to-summary-disposition-motions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom.harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local Rules of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MASSACHUSETTS FEDERAL COURTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/?p=2316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />The U.S. Court of Appeals will no longer require four copies of a memorandum or brief in support of a motion for summary disposition, among several other minor "housekeeping" changes affecting Local Rules 22.1(e), 27.0(c), and 33.0(a) and (f).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://massrules.lawyersweekly.com/2013/03/25/u-s-court-of-appeals-proposes-minor-changes-to-summary-disposition-motions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
